Station Hill 4 Revealed – Let’s get on with it

MainPlazaStationHill

We had Sir John Madejski’s original Station Hill plans, then Station Hill 2, and SH3.  The latest developers are trying to leave the past failures behind by ditching the numeric suffix.  Thankfully they’ve also avoided named alternatives, like Vista or XP.  No, we’re keeping it simple – not Station Hill Goes Forth, or Station Hill – The Goblet of Fire, just plain old Station Hill. And in fact the main evolution from Station Hill – The Prisoner of Azkaban is that they’re saying Expelliarmus to Garrard St car park and installing a podium to remove the ‘Hill’ altogether. Unique, of course, to the novels of the Station Hill series is that nothing actually ever happens: so many plots yet no storeys. But without going over the top, I feel we might have captured the golden egg at last. Welcome to Station Hill – Millennial Edition.

Station Hill from Station

Courtesy of the internet archive, I can pinpoint June 2006 as the first public exhibition for Station Hill proposals. I remember attending! So you’ll forgive me for thinking, quite literally, “we’ve been here before” as I attended a new event last Friday. A full thirteen years later, the £750-million question is “Will the outcome be any different this time?”. I very much hope it is.

StationHillSchemesTable

Before getting stuck into the new plans, let’s take a very quick look through the troubled history of this site. Station Hill 1 was John Madejski’s intial plan for a series of tall towers. It was approved by the council but rejected by the government on the basis of over-development. Undeterred, Madejski bought Friar’s Walk and came back with a bigger scheme: two striking towers of similar height to those proposed previously, but more slender. Larger public squares were incorporated, significant retail, leisure and cultural space, and a podium solution provided level access from the station through to Friar Street. The scheme was approved but with the onset of the credit crunch and subsequent recession, it quickly became labelled as unviable and impossible to deliver in phases.

Station Hill 3, with new developers, was a downbeat, pragmatic redesign, retaining the existing multi-storey car park and reducing the new builds to generic glass boxes that could be built independently in whatever sequence the market demanded. After two high profile failures, it was like appointing Sam Allardyce to grind out a result or two at the expense of any flair or creativity. The result, although approved, was clearly just too dull to inspire anyone to get round to actually implement it.

In that light, Station Hill 4 is positively Guadiolan. Under the new slogan “Time for more” Garrard St car park will go, allowing the podium idea to return linking the station up to Friar’s Walk on the level, with parking buried beneath. The central piazza is sizeable – fountains, trees and table tennis tables, all surrounded by cafes and restaurants. The focus on the convenient pedestrian route into town is a major positive and should mean a steady footfall throughout the day.

One of the most striking changes from that exhibition thirteen years ago, aside from the big screen fly-through CGIs replacing posters and blu tak, is the focus on the environment.  The relatively recent station area landscaping is swept away to be replaced with trees and planting.  Greenery dominates the opens spaces and roof gardens. Quite apart from aligning with the challenges of our time, it all makes for a far more pleasant-looking development.

viewFromStation

As expected, the allocated area for shops is reduced. In fact it’s rebranded “lifestyle space” as an attempted millennial reincarnation of the struggling retail and casual dining sectors. It’ll be marketed by agents “Distrkt“, which is clearly not riddikulus – more kewl… or sic?  I do feel they are serious about creating a vibrant area that caters for town centre workers and residents – two cohorts this development will swell significantly with over 1000 homes now planned and two large office blocks.

The buildings are tall by Reading, Berkshire or Thames Valley standards, and the heights are increased very slightly from SH3, but are still well below the previously approved Madejski plans. I would favour adding a few more floors, particularly to the office building nearest the station, which I always thought was supposed to be the central landmark for the town.  A little extra height at the station end would be even more beneficial if it meant it would be viable to reduce the building footprints slightly, allowing even larger public areas. The impressive, glistening CGIs all focus on the lower levels and landscaping. The message is pretty much “nothing to see here” higher up, where I am hoping for something more striking.

viewFromNorthWest

Perhaps, though, I’m being too picky. This site has stood under-used or derelict for a generation. In hindsight, an imperfect but instant reincarnation would already be half way towards its next regeneration. It’s time to get cracking, and this looks pretty well thought through. Hopefully the council will make sure they get what they can in terms of affordable housing and contribution to infrastructure etc from the developers. But let’s not delay. Nobody wants a fifth Station Hill – The Order of the Phoenix so I’ll ease off the bowling alley and ice rink talk for today. There’s no magic spell to deliver everything the town needs on one site, and this scheme will provide a dynamic, modern commercial heart to the town. After more than a decade of delays, we really have no time for more.

What do you think of the plans? Your comments, as always very welcome – registration not required…

More images below, and full exhibition materials available here.

IMG_20190614_140407

_20190615_154451_20190615_154521

_20190615_154248

_20190615_154207

Screen Shot 2019-06-16 at 21.43.53

Station Hill 4 Revealed – Let’s get on with it

10 thoughts on “Station Hill 4 Revealed – Let’s get on with it

  1. Reading General says:

    If the multi-storey car park is leaving us and Garrard Street bridged I do think a trick is being missed here to make use of Garrard Street as a two way through route for our towns many buses, potentially replacing the western end of Friar Street as the through route and in turn creating a space away from through pedestrian flows for bus layover, terminal stops.

    Unimpressed with the lack of pinnacle for the tallest building, but I do like the car parking being buried again. The public (private) spaces seem nicer.

    Great write up again
    Cheers

    Liked by 1 person

    1. A sensible well thought out design. I like you had hoped for a more land marked building In terms of height (25+ stories) but perhaps that’s trade off we will have to accept.

      Well done to the planners now time to get it built.

      Liked by 2 people

  2. zag says:

    I’m so glad to see the Garrard street car park going, the more we pedestrianise the town center, the better it will become to live and work. Also encouraging people to live car free and use public transport instead.

    The plans look great to me and I own a flat literally opposite. The constant taxi noises and parking around there will hopefully be a distant memory when this is complete. One thing I do wish the council would attach as a planning restriction is the planting of all the trees. Those tend to get lost as the development progresses.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. If they continue to ignore disabled people’s needs and not use inclusive design instead of throwing a lift in that can easily break, then you’re telling disabled people to not live here because even our new stuff is not built for you.

    Trying to solve a problem by throwing something on top looks crap and shows your designers are ableist because they don’t remove the problem in the first place.
    Access can be done beautifully if done well and thought of in the first place. Disabled people aren’t going away. You’re just making them think it’s easier to never leave the house

    Also has anyone in reading heard of a mural or any type of art piece?

    Like

  4. Reading General says:

    I’m a little confused as I was under the impression the new plans here had a level through route through the whole development from the station to Friar Street.

    Like

    1. Yes, the new plans have a podium level connected to Friar’s Walk with an open-air footbridge, so the elevation is basically flat walking from the station to Friar St. The previously approved more simplistic SH3 plans had the pedestrian route at its natural ground level, so sloping steeply down to Garrard St then back up to Friar St. In this regard, the new plans (a return to the SH2 model) are a highly welcome step forward (or backward!)

      Like

Leave a Reply to Reading General Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.